2018
Scorecard on State Health System Performance

  • Overview
    • Rising death rates, high levels of obesity, and gaps in care are pressing challenges for states
    • Regional differences in performance persist, as do within-state disparities
    • Many states are not getting good value for their health care dollars
    • States made progress in areas that were the target of efforts to improve
  • Highlights
    • 1Hawaii
    • 2Massachusetts
    • 3Minnesota
    • 4Vermont
    • 5Utah
    • 6Iowa
    • 7Washington
    • 8Wisconsin
    • 9Connecticut
    • 10New Hampshire
    • 10Colorado
    • 10Rhode Island
    • 13Oregon
    • 14Idaho
    • 14California
    • 16South Dakota
    • 16Maine
    • 18New York
    • 19Montana
    • 20Maryland
    • 21Nebraska
    • 22Delaware
    • 23Pennsylvania
    • 23North Dakota
    • 25New Jersey
    • 26Illinois
    • 27Michigan
    • 28Virginia
    • 29Arizona
    • 30District of Columbia
    • 31New Mexico
    • 32Kansas
    • 33Wyoming
    • 34Alaska
    • 35North Carolina
    • 36Ohio
    • 37Indiana
    • 38South Carolina
    • 39Nevada
    • 41Georgia
    • 42Alabama
    • 42Kentucky
    • 44Texas
    • 44Missouri
    • 46West Virginia
    • 47Arkansas
    • 48Florida
    • 49Tennessee
    • 49Louisiana
    • 50Oklahoma
    • 51Mississippi
  • Conclusion
  • Methodology
  • PDF Download
  • Data Center

Share

Back

The Commonwealth Fund
State Data Center

Sign up to receive alerts and newsletters on the health policy topics you care about most.

Sign Up

©2018 The Commonwealth Fund

For more information about the report, contact David Radley at the Commonwealth Fund.